Warner Bros. Discovery is telling developers it plans to start “retiring” games published by its Adult Swim Games label, game makers who worked with the publisher tell Polygon. At least three games are under threat of being removed from Steam and other digital stores, with the fate of other games published by Adult Swim unclear.

The media conglomerate’s planned removal of those games echoes cuts from its film and television business; Warner Bros. Discovery infamously scrapped plans to release nearly complete movies Batgirl and Coyote vs. Acme, and removed multiple series from its streaming services. If Warner Bros. does go through with plans to delist Adult Swim’s games from Steam and digital console stores, 18 or more games could be affected.

News of the Warner Bros. plan to potentially pull Adult Swim’s games from Steam and the PlayStation Store was first reported by developer Owen Reedy, who released puzzle-adventure game Small Radios Big Televisions through the label in 2016. Reedy said on X Tuesday the game was being “retired” by Adult Swim Games’ owner. He responded to the company’s decision by making the Windows PC version of Small Radios Big Televisions available to download for free from his studio’s website.

  • Melmi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    So this is just a thing now? Removing media from the world?

    They found out it works so now it’s gonna become a trend.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      At least the developer for Small Radios Big Televisions is handing it out for free now. Looks like a pretty decent game.

    • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      They’ve been trying for at least 30 years, probably closer to 50-60 TBH.

      One of the concepts they(RIAA/MPAA) were looking into for the entire CD/DVD era was the idea of a time-limited disk that would only work for a short period of time before becoming unreadable.

      By the time they got it working, Steam was already a thing and distribution through physical media was on the way out.

      Now they control movie theaters through streaming. They stream the movies to the theaters, the theaters rarely get physical or even digital copies anymore. It just gets streamed right to the projector.

      • Thorned_Rose@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        They also monitor outbound streaming. I’ve twice had a documentary movie I was watching at a theatre stopped because so one was supposedly live streaming the movie to the internet. The second time it happened they stopped the movie until the person doing it stopped, only it turned out they made a mistake and no one was live streaming it at all - they just interrupted the movie for fucking ages because of wanky attitudes. What made it even more stupid was that it was a special screening for a one off event AND a pretty niche documentary that most people wouldn’t give a fuck about let alone pirate 🙄

    • Ogmios@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      That was always the point of digitizing the world. It’s crazy to me that people didn’t see it coming, but it’s nice that people are actually taking notice now.

      • Catsrules@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        I disagree, digitizing is what is saving a lot of the media. You can save hundreds of thousands of hours of videos and many games in a single 20TB drive today. You couldn’t do that without digital technology.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          In fact, the lack of digital storage is why, to name an infamous example, the only recordings of most episodes of the original Doctor Who show are from the private collections of viewers: the BBC, lacking both funding and storage space, were forced to record new content over episodes with no backup.

          I hate it when luddites pine for the days of my childhood and early adulthood where the storage, transfer, and use of every single type of media was so damn impractical compared to now.

          It’s like wanting to go back to horses and walking being the only forms of land transportation because some trains are loud 🤦

          • Fushuan [he/him]@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Yeah, it’s bizarre reading people say they want physical games because if it’s not physical steam might remove it. Bro just download it and don’t delete it from your device, steam is offering a re-download service but nothing is stopping users from just downloading the game and keeping it in their disks.

      • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Weve lost far more pre-digital copies of games than we have digital.

        Physical media breaks and degrades, once they stop selling it in a store and your copy doesnt work anymore its gone forever.

        Like you’re just so utterly wrong it’s mind boggling to see your comment upvoted by so many.

        • FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          You can make copies of physical media. Disk imaging isn’t some archaic sorcery lost to time, you know.

          • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Well, you can make copies of digital media too.

            Sure, there’s DRM, but it doesn’t matter whether it’s digital or physical in that instance, DRM can be added either way.

  • AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    … why? They’re complete products that just sit there and make money for almost no effort

    • ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      From what we have seen from Zaslav, I wouldn’t be surprised if they’re going to claim another creative tax write-off for the non-depreciated value of the assets.

      • CitizenKong@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        WarnerBrosDiscovery is in massive debt (40 billion) to AT&T, which is itself in even more debt (138 billion). They are trying to make as much money liquid as quickly as they can to pay off the debt, long term profitability be damned. I wouldn’t be surprised if WBD is bought by an ever bigger player in a few years (Apple, Sony, Disney or Microsoft).

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Products no longer available to buy should fall into public domain.

    WB are an absolute cancer. Suicide Squad fails spectacularly due to being a multiplayer live service game that nobody asked for, and their immediate response is to go all in on multiplayer live service games.

    Because heaven forbid the executives could be fucking wrong.

    • at_an_angle@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      Look, I’m not outright disagreeing with your first point. I think going that way will be a massive legal headache for just about every business.

      Mainly because of patents, copyright, and all the BS, but that’s a whole other thing. I’m mainly thinking about software.

      New software v1.0 is released and then updated to v1.1? Is it a new product? If so, does that mean that v1.0 should be free if they only offer the updated version? What constitutes software not being available in a legal sense?

      • Hootz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is not a matter of versions. If the content is not available for purchase then the only choice is piracy. But at what point does piracy end and it just become public domain (not even legally just them not giving a fuck to go after anyone)

    • Redward@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      That’s because they are gonna succeed where others have failed, lunch their own game store /s

    • Wes_Dev@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Step 1 - Push people to piracy.

      Step 2 - Complain to lawmakers about rampant piracy.

      Step 3 - Get governments to outlaw and shut down piracy sources, compatible technologies, and generally force more authoritarian standards and laws.

      Step 4 - P2P starts to die. Piracy starts to condense around large hubs.

      Step 5 - Make money suing the only large hubs of piracy that still exist, and shut them down.

      Step 6 - Profit from lack of competition and ability to force DRM into everything.

      • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        They’re probably betting on the majority of zoomers being too tech illiterate to know how to pirate having raised them on streaming.

        I guess we will see if they are right.

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Millennials were raised on VHS tapes and we could figure out Limewire. I doubt this is going to work out well for the studios.

          • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            8 months ago

            Meh, many X, Millennial and Z that I know are clueless - they only know what the lock-down mobile device let’s them see.

            It’s pretty sad, especially since X grew up before all this stuff.

        • JDubbleu@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          I’m a Zoomer with a Dell Optiplex running Ubuntu server, an 18 TB HDD, and 35 years of combined seed time. I’ll let you fill in the gaps. Many of us are extremely tech literate and often share our Plex/Jellyfin instances with friends. Many of these not-so-etch-literate friends ask how they can do this for themselves using their computers and we shoot them over instructions.

          Piracy is infinitely easier/more accessible than ever. It’s spreading like wildfire and thanks to the FOSS community anyone with a spare evening can get themselves up and running very quickly.

  • mudle@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Time, and time again, they prove how piracy is literally THE only option when it comes to preserving media.

      • Asafum@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        With Poes Law and all it’s kinda dumb to do that. Without hearing the tone it’s too easy to think they’re seriously stupid.

    • 4am@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      There should be a law in the United States - if you stop selling it, 1 year later you lose your copyright and it becomes public domain.

      • NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        If you can remove content from the marketplace for a tax write off, the removed content should become public property.

  • TommySoda@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    Not sure whether they will remove it entirely or just delist it. I love Steam and the convenience of it and the majority of my games are on Steam. But this is why we should be able to own our games. You never know when your favorite game decides to do something like this.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      I don’t think any games have been completely removed from Steam. In cases like this, they stop new purchases, but anyone who already has it keeps it.

      • s38b35M5@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        This comment seems to imply that at least some titles won’t function after the delisting, perhaps related to servers, perhaps not.

        • jabathekek@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          8 months ago

          AFAIK none of my steam games are only accessible through steam servers. All of my games are installed on-site in my HDD and I really don’t think Steam can uninstall them without my knowledge or consent. E.g. I can play any one of my games without an internet connection.

          • catloaf@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Any game that uses Steamworks or other DRM will not be playable offline (without first putting Steam into offline mode, for Steamworks games, maybe others).