• bran_buckler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    2 months ago

    Why is the changing her life part (losing weight and getting a divorce after seeing Bigfoot) relevant? Did she leave her husband to try to get with Bigfoot and is suing the state because they claim her new beau doesn’t exist? Wild!

      • WolfLink@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        How come even in 2024 with 4k HDR 120FPS video cameras on smartphones in everyone’s pockets, the alleged videos of Bigfoot are still complete mush?

        I don’t even see a bear in that video. It’s not clear there’s anything besides trees. It’s just a big dark blob.

      • EpeeGnome@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Right, see, those are relevant because they show the value of that inspiration. Inspiration that could have brought many more valuable changes to her life if she still had it, but sadly the park service stole that inspiration from her, along with many potential benefits it could have brought her if they’d just let her remain blissfully ignorant of the true identity of the inspiring bigfoot she thought she saw.

      • M137@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        “Inspiring”

        It made her feel things, deep animalistic things and that’s just the word she chose to not look even more crazy than she already seems.

    • snooggums@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Probably because she thought that the impossible was possible and took action based on that change in perception.

      Dating bigfoot being the impossible thing.

    • Uli@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, you’ve misunderstood. She married the Bigfoot and now she’s suing because she was perfectly happy not knowing he was just a bear. They had a destination wedding in London and the divorce lawyer’s bear-wedding annulment fee was 125 pounds.

    • Gork@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Likely an editorial error and got their stories mixed up. But I like your scenario.